This is not good news from my point of view – RSS feeds may be a bit ‘old school’ but I find it a great way to scan the news and any websites that I am interested in. And Google Reader served me well over the last few years as a way of aggregating all this data – that is until this coming July when Google are killing it.
Now this is all very sad for people like me who like to keep an eye on things in an easy to scan manner, but the real problem is the effect it will have on countries that censor the Internet. Sadly Google are going to be cutting links to the outside world for many parts of the world.
Less obvious is how many RSS readers, including Google’s, serve as anti-censorship tools for people living under oppressive regimes. That’s because it’s actually Google’s servers, located in the US or another country with uncensored internet, that accesses each feed. So a web user in say, Iran just needs access to google.com/reader in order to read websites that would otherwise be blocked.
Not a good move Google…..
We all use search engines – Google, Yahoo, Bing – it is almost impossible to use the web without recourse to them. They keep lots of information about the searches we make (and the people who make them), and then use it to their benefit. Every year however a selection of ‘top searches’ gets released by the companies (I think they see it as a bit of fun) – and here are the first batch!
These are the most searched terms on Yahoo in 2012 – no doubt people will read all sorts into this, and there may be some trends, but to me it looks pretty similar to other years.
My only question on the ten was who is Frank Foster? (and yes I don’t get out much!) – apparently he is (was) a character in Coronation Street (what ever that is?)
- How to make money
- Who unfollowed me?
- How to lose weight
- When do the clocks go back?
- How to write a CV
- When is Easter?
- Who killed Frank Foster?
- What is my IP address?
- What is a pleb?
- How to claim PPI yourself
No doubt Google’s top 10 will be out shortly…….
The ‘anti apple brigade’ always make a big issue about how Apple maintain a closed and very controlled environment for their products. This extends to the Apps that are available for the iPhone, iPad etc. generally this means that if you download one of the apps from the app store it will work and not do anything ‘nasty’ to your machine – and more importantly won’t try and steal your details.
Google is now attempting to crack down on rogue mobile apps on its Android platform with stricter guidelines for its developers. The measures include a ban on using icons that are “confusingly similar” to that of existing products. The search giant has also issued rules on how advertising should appear in apps.
The reason for this? Since its launch, the Google Play store has featured a significant number of malicious apps, or counterfeit versions of popular games such as Angry Birds. The new guidelines announced in an email to developers have 30 days to make sure their apps comply. Developers who do not comply with the measures could see their products removed from the store.
All sounds rather ‘Apple’ to me – although I am sure lots of people will disagree (until the next level of control is added by Google)
The ‘virtual book’ is taking over – we are all aware of that. You now see so many people reading on Kindles or similar devices (my wife who loves books has now gone over to a Kindle and loves it) so it is only a matter of time before hard copies of books go the way of the vinyl record – they will still be available but only as a luxury for people who refuse to move with the times.
So it is sad to see the demise of something that was always a part of my childhood – the Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print after 244 years. When its current stock runs out, it will no longer be available in book form.
This was always the ‘holy grail’ of information when I was at school, we didn’t have a copy of the volumes at home, (it cost a fortune) but the local library did, and the information available was simply amazing to a small boy! Obviously now our kids just log onto the internet and do a Wikipedia search or just ‘Google’ it. They probably get much more information far quicker and with the addition of colour pictures and videos. But they don’t have the pleasure of leafing through a large volume (that often had a ‘special’ smell).
It is competition from the internet that has caused the withdrawal of hard copy version – the encyclopaedia’s publisher is focusing instead on its digital editions. I don’t suppose we should be surprised, but it is another nail in the coffin for traditional reference books.